|
|
National Diversity Forum
|
|
||
|
Mission
| History | Current Initiatives | |
A PERSPECTIVE ON DIVERSITY
by Charles Dumas
The perception of diversity in the film and TV industry may
seem, to some, as greatly improved in 2006.
A big budget African American film, Dreamgirls, won a Golden Globe. There are multiple possibilities for Best
Actor awards for brothers in a veritable plethora of A-list pictures. (Though
Jennifer Hudson in the aforementioned Dreamgirls,
Penelope Cruz, and Rinko Kikuchi are the only sisters in the mix). The dream is realized, you say? Finally we
have reached a point where Hollywood seems to reflect the real diverse world
that we all live in? Not exactly.
I have been a member of SAG, AFTRA, AEA
for twenty-five years and the WGA for nearly twenty. I have also been on the
teaching side of the industry, twelve years as an associate professor at Penn
State and the Director of Temple’s Acting in
Media Program since last year. As a working actor, director, and writer, I have
had the opportunity to observe the ebbs and flows of our industry regarding
diversity. As a working African American actor, I’ve been bathed by those
tides.
True there have been some effective changes in the
representation of images of diverse people over the last twenty-five years and
especially over the last five. Correspondingly, that has provided jobs to those
of us hired to portray those characters on the screen. The stereotypes of African Americans that
cinema historian Bogle discusses, the “Mammies,
Toms, Coons” and their like would not be tolerated on today’s
screen, nor would many of the corresponding negative images of Asians,
Hispanics, or Africans. Yet at the same
time, in our post-911 frenzy, we permit the depiction of Muslims and Arabs to
be dehumanizing and disrespectful. Demonstrating that racism
has not disappeared, but changed targets. Also people and groups who are
at variance with U.S. foreign policy in the Middle-East or domestic policy
regarding immigrant low-wage workers are portrayed with contemptuous
disrespectful imagery. Two steps forward and one step back.
We should, also, not confuse cosmetic changes with
qualitative transformation, which needs be grounded in quantitative
reconstruction and major redistribution of power decisions. If we are to have
an industry that truly reflects the rich diversity of the world in which we
live, more people of color need to be in
positions of making decisions and
providing jobs for people of color and others.
Finally, we are in the middle of a major technological
revolution in the industry. People spend
more time in front of the computer than they do in front of the TV or at the
movies. That change has resulted in more people generating programs for the
Internet, but it has not resulted in a more positive environment for diversity.
More media producers cannot bring about greater diversity if the
producers’ orientations and inclinations are toward staid stereotypes and
bigoted images. Hands cannot construct the apparatus of transformation; for
that we need to change people’s hearts. And, brothers and sisters, that is what we, as artists and theatrical workers, should be
about anyway – facilitating the transformation of our collective
perspective.